Social Security stops trying to collect on old debts by seizing tax refund

By Marc Fisher, Monday, April 14, 3:49 PM E-mail the writer The Social Security Administration announced Monday that it will immediately cease efforts to collect on More »

Cameron: This Easter, let’s focus on the persecution of Christians around the world

POSTED AT 3:31 PM ON APRIL 13, 2014 BY ED MORRISSEY I missed this earlier in the week, but my Townhall More »

This Is What Employment In America Really Looks Like…

 By Michael Snyder, on April 6th, 2014 The level of employment in the United States has been declining since the More »

The Rise of American Totalitarianism

By Ben Shapiro April 9, 2014 6:53 am Last Thursday, Mozilla, the company that’s home to the web browser Firefox, forced More »

This Is Why It’s So Hard To Cut Medicare

Peter Suderman|Apr. 8, 2014 12:59 pm Monty Python / Universal PicturesHave you ever had a friend who is chronically about More »

Health plan premiums are skyrocketing, according to new survey of 148 insurance brokers

Scott Gottlieb | Forbes April 07, 2014 Article Highlights Health insurance premiums are showing the sharpest increases perhaps ever. April survey shows More »

50 Years of Federal Spending

Fifty years ago, one of the biggest-spending presidents in U.S. history was settling into office after coming to power the More »

The GM Scandal Is Worse Than You Think

By David Harsanyi April 5, 2014 6:40 am Here’s another reason government should never own a business. In February 2010, the More »

The Obama Economy and the Middle Class

By Associated Press April 4, 2014 12:10 pm WASHINGTON (AP) — A sense of belonging to the middle class occupies a cherished More »

Op-ed: Charles G. Koch Responds to Baseless Leftist Attacks

Daniel Doherty | Apr 03, 2014 The Left’s obsession with Koch Industries and the two brothers who founded it is almost surreal. More »

 
social security

Social Security stops trying to collect on old debts by seizing tax refund

By , Monday, April 14, 3:49 PM E-mail the writer

The Social Security Administration announced Monday that it will immediately cease efforts to collect on taxpayers’ debts to the government that are more than 10 years old.The action comes after The Washington Post reported that the government was seizing state and federal tax refunds that were on their way to about 400,000 Americans who had relatives who owed money to Social Security. In many cases, the people whose refunds were intercepted had never heard of any debt, and the debts dated as far back as the middle of the past century.

If you’re one of the millions of Americans using your tax refund like a “forced savings account,” here’s why you shouldn’t — with marshmallow Peeps to help explain. Michelle Singletary contributed to this video.

“I have directed an immediate halt to further referrals under the Treasury Offset Program to recover debts owed to the agency that are 10 years old and older pending a thorough review of our responsibility and discretion under the current law,” Social Security’s acting commissioner, Carolyn Colvin, said in a statement.

Colvin said anyone who has received Social Security or Supplemental Security Income benefits and “believes they have been incorrectly assessed with an overpayment” should contact the agency and “seek options to resolve the overpayment.”The effort to collect on old debts began with a single line in the 2008 farm bill that lifted the statute of limitations on debts to the government that are more than 10 years old. The Treasury Department then set up rules that allowed the government to settle such debts by intercepting taxpayers’ refunds. Treasury has collected about $2 billion in intercepted tax refunds this year, $75 million of that on debts delinquent for more than 10 years.Mary Grice, a federal worker who lives in Takoma Park, Md., never got the refunds she was expecting to see in her mailbox this year. The government seized her checks because of a $2,996 debt that was supposedly incurred under her father’s Social Security number. Her father died in 1960, when she was 4, and her mother received survivors’ benefits thereafter.

But 37 years passed between when Social Security says it overpaid someone in the Grice family and when Mary Grice’s refund was taken. She was unable to find out from the agency exactly who received the overpayment — her mother or perhaps her father’s first wife, both of whom are no longer living.

The suspension of the collection effort is “the right thing to do,” said Grice’s attorney, Robert Vogel. “It’s a first step. The next thing they have to do is stop collecting debts from children under any circumstances.”

Vogel filed suit in federal court in Greenbelt last week, alleging that the government denied Grice due process by failing to give her notice of the debt and by taking the money from her, even though she was not receiving government benefits at the time the debt was incurred.

Vogel and several members of Congress argued that the government should not be holding children accountable for the financial acts of their parents. The Federal Trade Commission,on its Web site, advises Americans that “family members typically are not obligated to pay the debts of a deceased relative from their own assets.”

After The Post’s article was published late last week, many hundreds of taxpayers who had had their refunds intercepted came forward and complained to members of Congress that they had been given no notice of the debts and that the government had not explained why they were being held responsible for debts that their deceased parents may have incurred.

In a note Social Security officials sent to several members of Congress on Monday, the agency said, “We will be reexamining our responsibilities under current law for such referrals and will be notifying you of our conclusions upon completion of the thorough review.”

In a letter to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Monday, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said that government agencies were apparently “not properly notifying individuals or allowing them to inspect records of the debt they supposedly owe, which are violations of the law.”

Grassley said that although Congress did authorize the government to seek payment on old debts, the law “says nothing about allowing the government to offset payments from an individual to pay debts not in his or her name. It is unclear where the government has that authority.”

The senator said that Congress created a rigorous system to ensure that debt collection is handled transparently, but “it appears that agencies are abusing this system.”

Bible_0

Cameron: This Easter, let’s focus on the persecution of Christians around the world

POSTED AT 3:31 PM ON APRIL 13, 2014 BY ED MORRISSEY

I missed this earlier in the week, but my Townhall colleague Sarah Jean Seman didn’t. Prime Minister David Cameron’s Easter address on Wednesday focuses in large part on the beneficial efforts by Christians in British society, and pledged to expand partnerships between those organizations and his government. Cameron also pledged to raise awareness of the persecution of Christians around the world, demanding freedom of religion as “an absolute, fundamental human right.” Cameron called Christianity “the most persecuted religion around the world”:

Second thing is I hope we can do more to raise the profile of the persecution of Christians around the world. It is the case today that our religion is now the most persecuted religion around the world. I think Britain can play a leading role in this. We have met our obligations in terms of the aid we give to countries around the world. We’re seen as a country which is engaged internationally, and I know that William Hague shares my view about this as does Sayeeda Warsi who leads on this issue in the Foreign Office. We should stand up against persecution of Christians and other religious groups wherever and whenever we can, and should be unashamed in doing so.

Cameron also wants to see more “evangelism” in improving his nation:

Whereas actually, what we both need more of is evangelism. More belief that we can get out there and actually change people’s lives and make a difference and improve both the spiritual, physical and moral state of our country, and we should be unashamed and clear about wanting to do that. And I’m sure there are people here of all political persuasions and no political persuasions, and I’m certainly not asking you to agree with everything the government does, but I hope you can see – hopefully more than moments, but real moments of evangelism, enthusiasm and wanting to make our world a better place.

It’s an interesting speech, chiefly in contrast to what American politicians usually say and do about the “spiritual” and “moral” state of our own nation. We tend to shy away from that language except within specific groups who are most receptive to it. It would be at least a little surprising to hear an American President talk in a national address about Christianity as even one vehicle to “improve both the spiritual, physical and moral state of our country,” and that’s not a reference to this current President, either. Citing only one religion in that context would create a firestorm of controversy no matter who would be President.

Cameron’s words on global Christian persecution are both correct and welcome. Perhaps it will prompt more heads of government to speak out as well.


Hit Counter provided by Acrylic Display